Latvian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Male Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Immigrants from North Macedonia
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Immigrants from North Macedonia
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,591,162 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,289,354 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.300 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Immigrants from North Macedonia |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.15% |
Maximum | 34.6% | 17.7% |
Range | 33.2% | 17.6% |
Mean | 9.2% | 7.9% |
Median | 8.1% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 10.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 3.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Immigrants from North Macedonia by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and Croatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North Macedonia are Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.81%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |