Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from France Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Immigrants from France
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Immigrants from France
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from France Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,175,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,810,064 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 0.98%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from France |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 41.3% | 44.6% |
Range | 39.2% | 43.0% |
Mean | 12.1% | 13.3% |
Median | 10.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 14.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from France by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and French (12.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |