Immigrants from Belarus vs Basque Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Basque
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Basques
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Basque Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,175,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,726,735 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Basque |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 41.3% | 35.4% |
| Range | 39.2% | 34.4% |
| Mean | 12.1% | 12.9% |
| Median | 10.5% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Basques by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Pakistani (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Peruvian (12.9%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |