Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Thailand Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from the Azores
Immigrants from Thailand
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from the Azores
Immigrants from Thailand
14.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from the Azores vs Immigrants from Thailand Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,244,959 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,905,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from the Azores | Immigrants from Thailand |
Minimum | 0.65% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 25.2% | 44.1% |
Range | 24.5% | 42.3% |
Mean | 12.0% | 17.6% |
Median | 11.3% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from the Azores and Immigrants from Thailand by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.86%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |