Dutch vs South African Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Dutch
South African
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Dutch
South Africans
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch vs South African Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 535,626,808 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Dutch and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.170 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,617,887 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.614 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch | South African |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 36.1% | 34.6% |
| Range | 34.4% | 32.6% |
| Mean | 13.3% | 13.6% |
| Median | 13.4% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 17.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch and South Africans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Immigrants from Switzerland (15.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Denmark (15.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Jordanian (15.1%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Scottish (15.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Native Hawaiian (15.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (15.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Romanians | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Dutch | 95.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Serbians | 95.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Jordanians | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Pakistanis | 94.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| English | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Basques | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Armenians | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Belgians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| South Africans | 93.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Scottish | 93.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |