Icelander vs Immigrants from Germany Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
Immigrants from Germany
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Immigrants from Germany
11.9%
POVERTY
77.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
POVERTY
72.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Immigrants from Germany Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,621,690 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.385 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,719,504 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.827 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 0.70%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | Immigrants from Germany |
Minimum | 0.44% | 5.8% |
Maximum | 22.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 22.4% | 94.2% |
Mean | 9.2% | 20.6% |
Median | 8.9% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 22.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 20.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 19.8% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Immigrants from Germany by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Brazilian (11.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Basque (11.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Syrian (12.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from France (11.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Germany are Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (12.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Chileans | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 83.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 82.4 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.9% |
Pakistanis | 82.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Hungarians | 63.6 /100 | #155 | Good 12.2% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |