Immigrants from Brazil vs Canadian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 337,720,303 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 427,690,103 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.676 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 0.12%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Brazil	Canadian
Minimum	1.1%	7.3%
Maximum	45.1%	100.0%
Range	43.9%	92.7%
Mean	16.2%	34.1%
Median	14.8%	25.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.3%	15.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.9%	41.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.6%	26.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.2%	27.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.1%	26.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil and Canadians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.5%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Carpatho Rusyn (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Palestinian (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Czechoslovakian (15.3%, a difference of 0.55%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Native Hawaiians	93.4 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 15.2%
Belgians	93.1 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 15.2%
South Africans	93.0 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 15.2%
Scottish	93.0 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	92.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Norway	92.3 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%
Tlingit-Haida	92.2 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.3%
Czechoslovakians	92.1 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.3%
Palestinians	91.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 15.4%
Carpatho Rusyns	91.1 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 15.4%
Canadians	90.6 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Brazil	90.3 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 15.4%
Mongolians	90.2 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	90.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	88.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 15.5%
Welsh	88.3 /100 \| #133	Excellent 15.5%
Peruvians	88.1 /100 \| #134	Excellent 15.5%
Portuguese	87.5 /100 \| #135	Excellent 15.5%
Icelanders	87.5 /100 \| #136	Excellent 15.5%
Immigrants \| Spain	87.1 /100 \| #137	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	86.5 /100 \| #138	Excellent 15.6%