Eastern European vs Burmese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Eastern European
Burmese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Eastern Europeans
Burmese
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Eastern European vs Burmese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,773,883 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,783,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.67%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Eastern European | Burmese |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 59.6% | 48.2% |
| Range | 58.2% | 46.5% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 11.4% |
| Median | 8.8% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Eastern Europeans and Burmese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Italian (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |