Czech vs Macedonian Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
 Macedonian
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Macedonians
10.8%
POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Macedonian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,408,527 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,607,264 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.328 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.36%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Macedonian | 
| Minimum | 0.93% | 0.75% | 
| Maximum | 34.6% | 21.4% | 
| Range | 33.7% | 20.7% | 
| Mean | 9.5% | 8.4% | 
| Median | 9.5% | 8.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 5.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 10.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 4.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 4.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 4.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Macedonians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Greece (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Pakistan (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Russian (10.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Cypriot (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Tongan (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Poland (10.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Tongan (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Cypriot (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Greece (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (10.8%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% | 
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% | 
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% | 
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% | 
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% | 
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% | 
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% | 
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% | 
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% | 
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |