Czech vs Laotian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Czech
Laotian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Czechs
Laotians
9.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
79.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Laotian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,004,633 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,417,666 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 17.8%.
![Czech vs Laotian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/seniors-poverty-over-65/czechs-vs-laotians-seniors-poverty-over-65-chart.webp)
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Laotian |
Minimum | 2.2% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 42.3% | 29.9% |
Range | 40.1% | 27.9% |
Mean | 10.8% | 11.6% |
Median | 8.9% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are German (9.0%, a difference of 0.53%), English (9.1%, a difference of 0.67%), Lithuanian (9.1%, a difference of 0.77%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Scandinavian (9.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.0% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Alaskan Athabascan (10.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Iraqi (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Greece (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and American (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 10.5% |
Portuguese | 84.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 83.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Europe | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 10.5% |
Osage | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Asia | 80.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.6% |
Iraqis | 80.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.6% |
Laotians | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 10.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 79.0 /100 | #147 | Good 10.6% |
Americans | 78.1 /100 | #148 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 78.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 77.3 /100 | #150 | Good 10.6% |
Spanish | 76.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 10.6% |