Czech vs European Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Czech
European
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Czechs
Europeans
9.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs European Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,004,633 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,921,021 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 1.9%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | European |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 42.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 40.1% | 98.2% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 19.6% |
| Median | 8.9% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 23.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 23.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Europeans by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are German (9.0%, a difference of 0.53%), English (9.1%, a difference of 0.67%), Lithuanian (9.1%, a difference of 0.77%), Maltese (9.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Scandinavian (9.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Europeans are Scottish (9.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Slovak (9.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Dutch (9.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Polish (9.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Swiss (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.3% |