Czech vs Laotian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Czech
Laotian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Czechs
Laotians
14.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Laotian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,396,955 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,108,732 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Laotian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 36.6% | 90.3% |
| Range | 35.5% | 89.9% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 18.2% |
| Median | 14.5% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.4% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 15.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Laotians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Moldova (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Greek (14.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Scotland (14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and Italian (14.2%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Philippines (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Zimbabwean (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
| Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.1% |
| Italians | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Laotians | 99.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 98.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |