Croatian vs Korean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Korean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Koreans
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Korean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,484,978 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,221,953 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Croatian | Korean |
Minimum | 0.92% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 35.7% | 30.9% |
Range | 34.8% | 30.3% |
Mean | 11.8% | 10.4% |
Median | 10.0% | 9.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 11.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Koreans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Macedonian (11.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Poland (11.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |