Czech vs Bhutanese Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Czechs Bhutanese

COMPARE

Czech

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Blackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban CypriotCzechCzechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Bhutanese

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean BermudanBhutaneseBlackfeet Bolivian Brazilian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year OldsFemale Poverty Among 25-34 Year OldsChild Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison

Czechs

Bhutanese

Exceptional

12.9%

FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS

90.3/ 100

METRIC RATING

127th/ 347

METRIC RANK

11.4%

FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS

99.9/ 100

METRIC RATING

25th/ 347

METRIC RANK

Czech vs Bhutanese Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,997,416 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,147,907 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 12.8%.

Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Czech	Bhutanese
Minimum	3.0%	1.8%
Maximum	50.0%	33.8%
Range	47.0%	31.9%
Mean	15.7%	11.5%
Median	14.0%	9.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.6%	6.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.8%	13.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.3%	7.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.4%	6.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.3%	6.7%

Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

Demographics Similar to Czechs by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Syrian (12.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North America (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (12.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Fiji (12.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Canada (12.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Carpatho Rusyns	93.0 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 12.8%
Romanians	92.8 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	92.7 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 12.8%
Slovenes	92.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	92.0 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 12.8%
Immigrants \| Canada	91.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 12.9%
Immigrants \| Fiji	91.2 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 12.9%
Czechs	90.3 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 12.9%
Syrians	90.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 12.9%
Immigrants \| North America	89.7 /100 \| #129	Excellent 12.9%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	89.6 /100 \| #130	Excellent 12.9%
Pakistanis	88.4 /100 \| #131	Excellent 13.0%
Immigrants \| Hungary	88.3 /100 \| #132	Excellent 13.0%
Serbians	87.6 /100 \| #133	Excellent 13.0%
Afghans	85.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 13.0%

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Tongan (11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Maltese (11.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Bolivian (11.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Asian (11.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Greece (11.5%, a difference of 0.45%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 11.2%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 11.2%
Okinawans	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 11.3%
Turks	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 11.4%
Asians	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 11.4%
Bolivians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 11.4%
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 11.4%
Bhutanese	99.9 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 11.4%
Tongans	99.9 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 11.5%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 11.5%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.9 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 11.5%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 11.5%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 11.5%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.9 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 11.6%