Chinese vs Bhutanese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Chinese
Bhutanese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Chinese
Bhutanese
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Bhutanese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,186,861 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 434,270,600 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 2.3%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 53.8% | 37.8% |
| Range | 52.0% | 37.1% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 12.1% |
| Median | 12.1% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.8% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Bhutanese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Iranian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Iran (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Burmese (13.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Korea (13.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Okinawan (13.4%, a difference of 0.65%), Indian (Asian) (13.4%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (13.3%, a difference of 0.75%), Immigrants from Korea (13.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and Burmese (13.2%, a difference of 0.96%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.8% |