Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Alaskan Athabascan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Alaskan Athabascans
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Alaskan Athabascan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,258,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,812,962 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 3.9% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 30.5% | 72.7% |
| Range | 26.6% | 71.3% |
| Mean | 14.5% | 20.4% |
| Median | 13.5% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 30.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 22.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 16.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Alaskan Athabascans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.55%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nepalese (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Tsimshian (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Liberian (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Sudanese (12.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Ghanaians | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.7% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Liberians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |