Burmese vs Maltese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Burmese
Maltese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Burmese
Maltese
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Maltese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,212,415 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,909,171 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 5.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Maltese |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 43.4% | 80.5% |
| Range | 42.2% | 79.3% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 18.7% |
| Median | 9.2% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 14.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 14.2% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Maltese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 0.93%), Bulgarian (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Cypriot (13.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |