Nonimmigrants vs Maltese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Maltese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Maltese
18.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Maltese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,419,552 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,909,171 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693 and weighted average of 13.7%, a difference of 33.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Maltese |
Minimum | 7.6% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 39.2% | 80.5% |
Range | 31.6% | 79.3% |
Mean | 17.9% | 18.7% |
Median | 17.4% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 22.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 14.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 14.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Alaskan Athabascan (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.84%), Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Turkish (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |