British vs Canadian Male Poverty
COMPARE
British
Canadian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
British
Canadians
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Canadian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,450,397 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,032,660 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Canadian |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 68.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 65.4% | 98.0% |
| Mean | 16.5% | 23.8% |
| Median | 10.4% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.0% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.0% | 18.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 25.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 24.7% |
Demographics Similar to British and Canadians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Denmark (10.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Cambodian (10.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Laotian (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |