Bhutanese vs American Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
American
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Americans
11.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs American Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,052,143 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,452,032 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 29.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | American |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 92.7% |
| Range | 64.2% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 23.2% |
| Median | 9.4% | 19.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 24.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Americans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from Micronesia (14.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |