Bangladeshi vs Choctaw Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Choctaw
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Choctaw
6.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Choctaw Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,885,862 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,584,402 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 4.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.85% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 18.9% | 31.2% |
| Range | 18.1% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 10.7% |
| Median | 5.4% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.1% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Choctaw by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.37%), Comanche (6.0%, a difference of 0.50%), Alaskan Athabascan (6.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and Jamaican (6.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Barbadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (6.2%, a difference of 0.99%), Immigrants from Bahamas (6.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (6.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Creek | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |