Arapaho vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty
COMPARE
Arapaho
Immigrants from Guatemala
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Arapaho
Immigrants from Guatemala
16.3%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Immigrants from Guatemala Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,778,572 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 16.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,145,894 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.479 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 5.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arapaho | Immigrants from Guatemala |
Minimum | 9.8% | 5.8% |
Maximum | 53.9% | 62.9% |
Range | 44.2% | 57.2% |
Mean | 23.5% | 19.7% |
Median | 22.0% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 22.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.4% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Immigrants from Guatemala by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from Honduras (16.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Menominee (16.4%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Congo (16.1%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Dominica (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Immigrants from Mexico (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Caribbean (15.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 0.44%), African (15.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and Choctaw (15.6%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.6% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.8% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.9% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 15.9% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.2% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.3% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.6% |