Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Immigrants from China
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Immigrants from China
13.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,912,892 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,614,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 2.2%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Europe | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 3.1% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 42.3% |
Range | 96.9% | 41.4% |
Mean | 28.7% | 12.6% |
Median | 14.2% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.6% | 13.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.5% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.0% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe and Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe are Immigrants from Australia (13.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Lithuanian (14.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and Korean (14.0%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Estonians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |