Yup'ik vs Creek In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Yup'ik
 Creek
 In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Yup'ik
Creek
76.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Creek In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,955,803 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 76.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,425,767 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.326 and weighted average of 80.4%, a difference of 5.1%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Creek | 
| Minimum | 32.8% | 25.0% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 67.2% | 75.0% | 
| Mean | 76.1% | 76.2% | 
| Median | 78.8% | 78.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 67.5% | 70.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.7% | 83.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 12.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 13.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 13.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Creek by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Crow (75.9%, a difference of 0.68%), Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 0.87%), Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Sioux (80.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Pueblo (80.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Colville (80.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Houma (79.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and Kiowa (79.8%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% | 
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |