Yup'ik vs Chilean In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Chilean
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Yup'ik
Chileans
76.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
84.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Chilean In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,955,803 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 76.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,589,082 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 84.9%, a difference of 11.1%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Chilean |
| Minimum | 32.8% | 61.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 67.2% | 38.4% |
| Mean | 76.1% | 88.0% |
| Median | 78.8% | 85.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 67.5% | 83.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.7% | 96.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.8% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 8.7% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Crow (75.9%, a difference of 0.68%), Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 0.87%), Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Indonesia (84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Bhutanese (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Sri Lankan (85.0%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 87.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Bhutanese | 87.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Chileans | 85.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 84.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Colombians | 82.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Uruguayans | 78.5 /100 | #144 | Good 84.9% |
| Palestinians | 77.7 /100 | #145 | Good 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 76.6 /100 | #146 | Good 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 76.3 /100 | #147 | Good 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 76.2 /100 | #148 | Good 84.9% |