Samoan vs Immigrants from Lithuania In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,191,337 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.11%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Samoan	Immigrants from Lithuania
Minimum	43.6%	57.7%
Maximum	78.1%	72.8%
Range	34.5%	15.1%
Mean	63.5%	65.3%
Median	65.1%	65.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	60.5%	63.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	67.8%	67.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.3%	3.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.6%	3.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.5%	3.1%

Demographics Similar to Samoans and Immigrants from Lithuania by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Icelander (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Guatemalan (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 65.7%
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Oceania	87.5 /100 \| #147	Excellent 65.5%