Russian vs Immigrants from Oceania In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Russian
Immigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Russians
Immigrants from Oceania
64.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
18.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
87.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Immigrants from Oceania In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,265,554 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 64.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,520,725 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.717 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.96%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Russian | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 18.2% | 9.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 86.8% |
Range | 81.8% | 77.7% |
Mean | 60.0% | 59.8% |
Median | 62.9% | 63.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 51.1% | 54.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.3% | 66.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 15.2% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Russians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Slovene (64.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Jamaican (64.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Ukrainian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Belgium (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and Armenian (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Haitians | 30.6 /100 | #196 | Fair 65.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 28.7 /100 | #197 | Fair 65.0% |
Greeks | 26.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 64.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.1 /100 | #199 | Fair 64.9% |
Armenians | 20.2 /100 | #200 | Fair 64.9% |
Ukrainians | 19.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 19.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 64.9% |
Russians | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 64.9% |
Slovenes | 18.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 64.9% |
Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Cypriot (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Albania (65.4%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |