Bangladeshi vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Comparison
Bangladeshis
Chickasaw
78.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
74.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
10.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,435,907 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 78.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,683,013 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 74.5%, a difference of 4.9%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bangladeshi | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 57.0% | 44.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 43.0% | 55.9% |
Mean | 80.8% | 73.9% |
Median | 80.6% | 72.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 75.6% | 65.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.7% | 83.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 13.0% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (78.1%, a difference of 0.0%), French Canadian (78.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (78.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Pennsylvania German (78.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Yugoslavian (78.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 78.6% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 78.5% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 78.5% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 78.4% |
Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 78.4% |
Cape Verdeans | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 78.3% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 78.1% |
Bangladeshis | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 78.1% |
French Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 78.1% |
Puget Sound Salish | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 78.0% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 78.0% |
Yugoslavians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 78.0% |
Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 78.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 77.9% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 77.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Norway (74.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Peru (74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Nepalese (74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from India (74.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Chilean (74.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 13.2 /100 | #214 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 12.7 /100 | #215 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 12.7 /100 | #216 | Poor 74.5% |
Chileans | 12.5 /100 | #217 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 74.5% |
Nepalese | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Norway | 10.3 /100 | #220 | Poor 74.5% |
Chickasaw | 10.3 /100 | #221 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | India | 9.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 74.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 7.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 74.4% |
Seminole | 6.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 74.3% |
Ghanaians | 6.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 74.3% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 5.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 74.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 74.3% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 5.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 74.2% |