Norwegian vs Immigrants from Romania In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 533,394,126 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 65.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,014,238 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.27%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Norwegian	Immigrants from Romania
Minimum	27.6%	32.1%
Maximum	92.5%	85.3%
Range	64.9%	53.2%
Mean	65.2%	61.6%
Median	65.8%	64.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	62.9%	59.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	68.5%	66.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.5%	6.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.5%	9.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.5%	9.0%

Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Immigrants from Romania by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Korean (65.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Iraqi (65.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Ecuadorian (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Philippines (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Samoan (65.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Iraqis	95.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 65.7%
Norwegians	95.3 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 65.7%
Koreans	95.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 65.7%
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%