Navajo vs Marshallese In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Navajo
Marshallese
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Navajo
Marshallese
73.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Marshallese In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,771,118 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.481 and weighted average of 73.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,760,991 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 79.2%, a difference of 7.4%.

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Navajo | Marshallese |
Minimum | 31.7% | 24.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 68.3% | 76.0% |
Mean | 69.8% | 73.9% |
Median | 72.0% | 77.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.5% | 73.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.0% | 82.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.6% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 20.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.8% | 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo and Marshallese by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Crow (75.9%, a difference of 2.9%), Yup'ik (76.4%, a difference of 3.6%), Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 4.5%), Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Hopi (79.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |