Immigrants from Philippines vs Bhutanese In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,291,976 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,605,488 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.28%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Philippines	Bhutanese
Minimum	39.6%	52.7%
Maximum	88.4%	82.4%
Range	48.8%	29.7%
Mean	66.5%	64.2%
Median	65.8%	64.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	63.8%	61.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	68.3%	66.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.5%	5.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.5%	4.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.5%	4.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Bhutanese by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Guatemala (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Ecuadorian (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Oceania (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Cypriot (65.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.080%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Oceania	87.5 /100 \| #147	Excellent 65.5%
Bhutanese	86.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 65.5%