Cherokee vs Houma In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Cherokee
 Houma
 In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Cherokee
Houma
81.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Houma In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,185,438 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 81.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,791,353 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 79.9%, a difference of 2.1%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Houma | 
| Minimum | 44.6% | 40.7% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 93.9% | 
| Range | 55.4% | 53.2% | 
| Mean | 78.0% | 76.8% | 
| Median | 79.0% | 79.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.7% | 71.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.3% | 86.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 15.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 13.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 13.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Houma by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Alaskan Athabascan (81.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from the Azores (81.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Arapaho (81.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Choctaw (81.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Shoshone (81.4%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Kiowa (79.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Pueblo (80.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Inupiat (79.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Sioux (80.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and Creek (80.4%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.4% | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.4% | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.3% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.2% | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.2% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.1% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.0% | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.8% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |