Australian vs Czech In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Australian
Czech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Australians
Czechs
65.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
71.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
81.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Czech In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,163,192 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.426 and weighted average of 65.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,823,613 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 65.4%, a difference of 0.16%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Australian | Czech |
| Minimum | 45.5% | 34.2% |
| Maximum | 92.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 46.8% | 65.8% |
| Mean | 63.8% | 64.4% |
| Median | 62.8% | 64.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.2% | 60.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.0% | 69.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Australians and Czechs by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Albanian (65.3%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (65.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (65.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Danish (65.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (65.3%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Yugoslavian (65.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (65.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (65.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Armenia (65.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 75.9 /100 | #156 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 75.7 /100 | #157 | Good 65.3% |
| Panamanians | 75.2 /100 | #158 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 74.6 /100 | #159 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 73.5 /100 | #160 | Good 65.3% |
| Australians | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 65.3% |
| Albanians | 70.8 /100 | #162 | Good 65.3% |
| South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #163 | Good 65.3% |
| Danes | 68.8 /100 | #164 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 68.1 /100 | #165 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 67.3 /100 | #166 | Good 65.3% |