Brazilian vs Czech In Labor Force | Age > 16

On this page

Metric Comparison Correlation Chart Correlation Data Summary Similar Demographics Brazilians Czechs

COMPARE

Brazilian

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet BolivianBrazilianBritish British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban Cypriot Czechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

Nonimmigrants Immigrants Afghanistan Africa Albania Argentina Armenia Asia Australia Austria Bahamas Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Burma/Myanmar Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Caribbean Central America Chile China Colombia Congo Costa Rica Croatia Cuba Czechoslovakia Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Eastern Africa Eastern Asia Eastern Europe Ecuador Egypt El Salvador England Eritrea Ethiopia Europe Fiji France Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Korea Kuwait Laos Latin America Latvia Lebanon Liberia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico Micronesia Middle Africa Moldova Morocco Nepal Netherlands Nicaragua Nigeria North America North Macedonia Northern Africa Northern Europe Norway Oceania Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Scotland Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Somalia South Africa South America South Central Asia South Eastern Asia Southern Europe Spain Sri Lanka St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Turkey Uganda Ukraine Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela Vietnam West Indies Western Africa Western Asia Western Europe Yemen Zaire Zimbabwe Azores

Czech

Race

Asian Black/African American Hawaiian Hispanic or Latino Native/Alaskan White/Caucasian

Ancestry

Afghan African Alaska Native Alaskan Athabascan Albanian Aleut Alsatian American Apache Arab Arapaho Argentinean Armenian Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Australian Austrian Bahamian Bangladeshi Barbadian Basque Belgian Belizean Bermudan Bhutanese Blackfeet Bolivian British British West Indian Bulgarian Burmese Cajun Cambodian Canadian Cape Verdean Carpatho Rusyn Celtic Central American Central American Indian Cherokee Cheyenne Chickasaw Chilean Chinese Chippewa Choctaw Colombian Colville Comanche Costa Rican Cree Creek Croatian Crow Cuban CypriotCzechCzechoslovakian Danish Delaware Dominican Dutch Dutch West Indian Eastern European Ecuadorian Egyptian English Estonian Ethiopian European Fijian Filipino Finnish French French American Indian French Canadian German German Russian Ghanaian Greek Guamanian/Chamorro Guatemalan Guyanese Haitian Hmong Honduran Hopi Houma Hungarian Icelander Indian (Asian)Indonesian Inupiat Iranian Iraqi Irish Iroquois Israeli Italian Jamaican Japanese Jordanian Kenyan Kiowa Korean Laotian Latvian Lebanese Liberian Lithuanian Lumbee Luxembourger Macedonian Malaysian Maltese Marshallese Menominee Mexican Mexican American Indian Mongolian Moroccan Native Hawaiian Navajo Nepalese New Zealander Nicaraguan Nigerian Northern European Norwegian Okinawan Osage Ottawa Paiute Pakistani Palestinian Panamanian Paraguayan Pennsylvania German Peruvian Pima Polish Portuguese Potawatomi Pueblo Puerto Rican Puget Sound Salish Romanian Russian Salvadoran Samoan Scandinavian Scotch-Irish Scottish Seminole Senegalese Serbian Shoshone Sierra Leonean Sioux Slavic Slovak Slovene Somali South African South American South American Indian Soviet Union Spaniard Spanish Spanish American Spanish American Indian Sri Lankan Subsaharan African Sudanese Swedish Swiss Syrian Taiwanese Thai Tlingit-Haida Tohono O'Odham Tongan Trinidadian and Tobagonian Tsimshian Turkish U.S. Virgin Islander Ugandan Ukrainian Uruguayan Ute Venezuelan Vietnamese Welsh West Indian Yakama Yaqui Yugoslavian Yuman Yup'ik Zimbabwean

Immigration

In Labor Force | Age > 16

Social Comparison

Income

Per Capita Income Median Family Income Median Household Income Median Earnings Median Male Earnings Median Female Earnings Householder Income Under 25 years Householder Income Ages 25 - 44 years Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Householder Income Over 65 years Wage/Income Gap

Poverty

Poverty Family Poverty Male Poverty Female Poverty Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Single Male Poverty Single Female Poverty Single Father Poverty Single Mother Poverty Married-Couple Family Poverty Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Receiving Food Stamps

Unemployment

Labor Participation

Family Structure

Family Households Family Households with Children Married-couple Households Average Family Size Single Father Households Single Mother Households Currently Married Divorced or Separated Births to Unmarried Women

Vehicle Availability

No Vehicles in Household 1 or more Vehicles in Household 2 or more Vehicles in Household 3 or more Vehicles in Household 4 or more Vehicles in Household

Education Level

No Schooling Completed Nursery School Kindergarten 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade, No Diploma High School Diploma GED/Equivalency College, Under 1 year College, 1 year or more Associate's Degree Bachelor's Degree Master's Degree Professional Degree Doctorate Degree

Disability

Disability Male Disability Female Disability Disability Age Under 5 Disability Age 5 to 17 Disability Age 18 to 34 Disability Age 35 to 64 Disability Age 65 to 74 Disability Age Over 75 Vision Disability Hearing Disability Cognitive Disability Ambulatory Disability Self-Care Disability

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison

Brazilians

Czechs

Exceptional

Excellent

66.6%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16

100.0/ 100

METRIC RATING

46th/ 347

METRIC RANK

65.4%

IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16

81.5/ 100

METRIC RATING

151st/ 347

METRIC RANK

Brazilian vs Czech In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,965,381 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 66.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,823,613 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 65.4%, a difference of 1.9%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Brazilian	Czech
Minimum	45.5%	34.2%
Maximum	73.8%	100.0%
Range	28.3%	65.8%
Mean	66.1%	64.4%
Median	66.8%	64.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	64.6%	60.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	69.1%	69.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.5%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.0%	9.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.9%	9.7%

Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16

Demographics Similar to Brazilians by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Bulgaria (66.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Nigerian (66.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (66.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (66.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Cape Verdean (66.6%, a difference of 0.080%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Salvadorans	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 66.8%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 66.8%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 66.8%
Senegalese	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 66.7%
Luxembourgers	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 66.7%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 66.7%
Immigrants \| Brazil	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 66.7%
Brazilians	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 66.6%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 66.6%
Nigerians	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 66.6%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 66.6%
Cape Verdeans	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 66.6%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 66.5%
Paraguayans	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 66.5%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 66.5%

Demographics Similar to Czechs by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Yugoslavian (65.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (65.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (65.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Armenia (65.3%, a difference of 0.080%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Oceania	87.5 /100 \| #147	Excellent 65.5%
Bhutanese	86.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Albania	85.7 /100 \| #149	Excellent 65.4%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	81.9 /100 \| #150	Excellent 65.4%
Czechs	81.5 /100 \| #151	Excellent 65.4%
Yugoslavians	81.3 /100 \| #152	Excellent 65.4%
Immigrants \| China	80.5 /100 \| #153	Excellent 65.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	78.3 /100 \| #154	Good 65.4%
Immigrants \| Armenia	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 65.3%
Immigrants \| Ireland	75.9 /100 \| #156	Good 65.3%
Immigrants \| Russia	75.7 /100 \| #157	Good 65.3%
Panamanians	75.2 /100 \| #158	Good 65.3%

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Oceania	87.5 /100 \| #147	Excellent 65.5%
Bhutanese	86.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Albania	85.7 /100 \| #149	Excellent 65.4%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	81.9 /100 \| #150	Excellent 65.4%
Czechs	81.5 /100 \| #151	Excellent 65.4%
Yugoslavians	81.3 /100 \| #152	Excellent 65.4%
Immigrants \| China	80.5 /100 \| #153	Excellent 65.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	78.3 /100 \| #154	Good 65.4%
Immigrants \| Armenia	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 65.3%
Immigrants \| Ireland	75.9 /100 \| #156	Good 65.3%
Immigrants \| Russia	75.7 /100 \| #157	Good 65.3%
Panamanians	75.2 /100 \| #158	Good 65.3%