Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Wage/Income Gap

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,315,173 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032 and weighted average of 22.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,693,436 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 22.4%, a difference of 2.0%.

Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary

Measurement	Subsaharan African	Immigrants from Middle Africa
Minimum	0.79%	6.5%
Maximum	45.6%	48.4%
Range	44.8%	41.9%
Mean	20.1%	20.4%
Median	19.9%	21.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	16.4%	17.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	23.0%	24.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.6%	6.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.4%	7.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.4%	7.1%

Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Wage/Income Gap

In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (22.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (22.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from El Salvador (22.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (22.7%, a difference of 0.31%), and Fijian (22.9%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Navajo (22.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cuba (22.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Ghanaian (22.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Fiji (22.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Ghana (22.3%, a difference of 0.24%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Wage/Income Gap
Immigrants \| Ghana	100.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 22.3%
Ghanaians	100.0 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 22.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 22.4%
Navajo	100.0 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	100.0 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Fiji	100.0 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	100.0 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 22.5%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	100.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 22.5%
Spanish American Indians	100.0 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 22.5%
Guatemalans	99.9 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 22.6%
Central American Indians	99.9 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 22.7%
Menominee	99.9 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 22.7%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	99.9 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 22.7%
Indonesians	99.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 22.7%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	99.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 22.7%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	99.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 22.8%
Sub-Saharan Africans	99.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 22.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	99.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 22.8%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	99.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 22.8%
Fijians	99.9 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 22.9%
Ecuadorians	99.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 22.9%