Slavic vs Immigrants from Chile Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,416,943 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096 and weighted average of $61,709. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,471,340 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of $62,354, a difference of 1.1%.

Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Slavic	Immigrants from Chile
Minimum	$29,063	$31,406
Maximum	$136,135	$193,611
Range	$107,072	$162,205
Mean	$62,217	$68,575
Median	$59,730	$64,728
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$42,874	$58,558
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$73,140	$74,792
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$30,267	$16,234
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$24,786	$29,777
Standard Deviation (Population)	$24,526	$29,198

Demographics Similar to Slavs and Immigrants from Chile by Householder Income Over 65 years

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Scottish ($61,735, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian ($61,673, a difference of 0.060%), Armenian ($61,656, a difference of 0.090%), Alsatian ($61,797, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Nepal ($61,843, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Brazil ($62,364, a difference of 0.020%), Alaskan Athabascan ($62,330, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Syria ($62,303, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan ($62,292, a difference of 0.10%), and Lebanese ($62,287, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Over 65 years
Immigrants \| Germany	83.9 /100 \| #132	Excellent $62,544
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	83.6 /100 \| #133	Excellent $62,522
Immigrants \| Brazil	81.2 /100 \| #134	Excellent $62,364
Immigrants \| Chile	81.0 /100 \| #135	Excellent $62,354
Alaskan Athabascans	80.6 /100 \| #136	Excellent $62,330
Immigrants \| Syria	80.2 /100 \| #137	Excellent $62,303
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	80.0 /100 \| #138	Excellent $62,292
Lebanese	79.9 /100 \| #139	Good $62,287
Arabs	79.6 /100 \| #140	Good $62,266
Canadians	79.0 /100 \| #141	Good $62,230
South American Indians	78.7 /100 \| #142	Good $62,215
Immigrants \| Belarus	77.8 /100 \| #143	Good $62,162
Immigrants \| Peru	74.4 /100 \| #144	Good $61,988
Immigrants \| Uganda	74.2 /100 \| #145	Good $61,976
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	72.7 /100 \| #146	Good $61,902
Immigrants \| Nepal	71.4 /100 \| #147	Good $61,843
Alsatians	70.5 /100 \| #148	Good $61,797
Scottish	69.1 /100 \| #149	Good $61,735
Slavs	68.5 /100 \| #150	Good $61,709
Hungarians	67.7 /100 \| #151	Good $61,673
Armenians	67.3 /100 \| #152	Good $61,656