Immigrants from Turkey vs Chinese Median Family Income

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,914,261 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and median family income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of $118,325. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,903 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and median family income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of $116,188, a difference of 1.8%.

Median Family Income Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Turkey	Chinese
Minimum	$87,281	$48,295
Maximum	$197,922	$176,564
Range	$110,641	$128,269
Mean	$130,330	$111,811
Median	$128,029	$112,252
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$110,406	$98,862
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$142,421	$127,363
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$32,015	$28,501
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$26,517	$27,086
Standard Deviation (Population)	$25,846	$26,847

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Chinese by Median Family Income

In terms of median family income, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Asia ($118,291, a difference of 0.030%), Australian ($118,440, a difference of 0.10%), Israeli ($118,577, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Lithuania ($118,053, a difference of 0.23%), and Estonian ($118,013, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia ($116,165, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa ($116,286, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia ($115,880, a difference of 0.27%), Maltese ($115,862, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Norway ($115,847, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Median Family Income
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional $119,800
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional $119,479
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional $119,262
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional $118,577
Australians	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional $118,440
Immigrants \| Turkey	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional $118,325
Immigrants \| Asia	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional $118,291
Immigrants \| Lithuania	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional $118,053
Estonians	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional $118,013
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional $117,912
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional $117,818
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional $117,780
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #45	Exceptional $117,344
Immigrants \| Russia	99.9 /100 \| #46	Exceptional $116,942
Immigrants \| Austria	99.9 /100 \| #47	Exceptional $116,830
Immigrants \| South Africa	99.9 /100 \| #48	Exceptional $116,286
Chinese	99.9 /100 \| #49	Exceptional $116,188
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional $116,165
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional $115,880
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional $115,862
Immigrants \| Norway	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional $115,847