Iroquois vs Puget Sound Salish Average Family Size
COMPARE
Iroquois
 Puget Sound Salish
 Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Iroquois
Puget Sound Salish
3.16
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.17
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Puget Sound Salish Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,368 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258 and weighted average of 3.16. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,155,775 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.17, a difference of 0.38%.
 
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Puget Sound Salish | 
| Minimum | 1.73 | 2.03 | 
| Maximum | 4.68 | 3.59 | 
| Range | 2.95 | 1.56 | 
| Mean | 3.07 | 3.05 | 
| Median | 3.10 | 3.11 | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.82 | 2.90 | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.34 | 3.25 | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.52 | 0.36 | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.50 | 0.34 | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.50 | 0.34 | 
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Puget Sound Salish by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Greece (3.16, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (3.16, a difference of 0.030%), Maltese (3.16, a difference of 0.040%), American (3.16, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (3.16, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Spain (3.17, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (3.17, a difference of 0.040%), South African (3.17, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.17, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (3.17, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 2.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.17 | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 2.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.17 | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 1.9 /100 | #250 | Tragic 3.17 | 
| Immigrants | Spain | 1.8 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.17 | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.17 | 
| South Africans | 1.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 3.17 | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 1.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 3.17 | 
| Cape Verdeans | 1.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 3.17 | 
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 1.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.17 | 
| Albanians | 1.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 3.17 | 
| Turks | 1.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Potawatomi | 1.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 1.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 1.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 1.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 1.0 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Americans | 1.0 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 0.9 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 0.9 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Iroquois | 0.8 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.16 | 
| Maltese | 0.8 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.16 |