Romanian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Births to Unmarried Women

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 350,464,918 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 28.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,731,208 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 28.4%, a difference of 1.3%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Measurement	Romanian	Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Minimum	4.3%	5.1%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	95.7%	94.9%
Mean	41.4%	42.1%
Median	25.1%	35.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	21.4%	25.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	66.7%	53.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	45.3%	28.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	33.7%	25.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	33.1%	25.1%

Demographics Similar to Romanians and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Kuwait (28.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Austria (28.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (28.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Danish (28.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Zimbabwean (28.7%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Tongan (28.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (28.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (28.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Europe (28.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Bolivian (28.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Immigrants \| Serbia	98.9 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 28.3%
Tongans	98.8 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	98.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Egypt	98.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 28.4%
Palestinians	98.7 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Europe	98.7 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 28.4%
Bolivians	98.7 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 28.5%
Laotians	98.6 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 28.5%
Jordanians	98.5 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 28.5%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.5 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 28.5%
Albanians	98.5 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 28.5%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	98.5 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 28.6%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	98.4 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 28.6%
Israelis	98.4 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 28.6%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	98.3 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 28.6%
Zimbabweans	98.2 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 28.7%
Danes	98.2 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 28.7%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	98.1 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 28.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	98.1 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 28.7%
Romanians	98.0 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 28.7%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	98.0 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 28.8%