Romanian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 373,710,201 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,223,465 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%.

Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Romanian	Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Minimum	3.3%	1.9%
Maximum	41.7%	55.6%
Range	38.3%	53.6%
Mean	12.9%	14.3%
Median	11.0%	10.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.1%	7.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	16.9%	15.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.8%	8.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.4%	12.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.3%	12.5%

Demographics Similar to Romanians and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75

In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Japan (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Syrian (11.6%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Ukrainian (11.7%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Jordan (11.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Burmese (11.7%, a difference of 0.34%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.6 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Sweden	92.6 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 11.6%
Romanians	92.3 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Japan	91.9 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	91.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 11.6%
Syrians	91.1 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 11.6%
Jordanians	90.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 11.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	90.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	90.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 11.6%
Immigrants \| Singapore	90.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 11.6%
Chickasaw	90.2 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 11.6%
Russians	89.9 /100 \| #106	Excellent 11.6%
Immigrants \| Oceania	89.4 /100 \| #107	Excellent 11.7%
Turks	89.4 /100 \| #108	Excellent 11.7%
South Africans	89.3 /100 \| #109	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Jordan	88.7 /100 \| #110	Excellent 11.7%
Burmese	88.7 /100 \| #111	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	88.4 /100 \| #112	Excellent 11.7%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	87.0 /100 \| #113	Excellent 11.7%
Ukrainians	86.9 /100 \| #114	Excellent 11.7%
New Zealanders	86.3 /100 \| #115	Excellent 11.7%