Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Israel Family Households
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Immigrants from Israel
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Potawatomi
Immigrants from Israel
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Israel Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,759,902 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 63.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,979,754 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529 and weighted average of 63.4%, a difference of 0.22%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Potawatomi | Immigrants from Israel |
| Minimum | 37.1% | 33.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 62.9% | 66.8% |
| Mean | 66.1% | 69.4% |
| Median | 65.3% | 65.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.2% | 60.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 79.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 18.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Immigrants from Israel by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Luxembourger (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Icelander (63.3%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Icelanders | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.7 /100 | #258 | Tragic 63.2% |