Pima vs Blackfeet Family Households
COMPARE
Pima
Blackfeet
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Pima
Blackfeet
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Blackfeet Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,539,566 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,476,715 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 63.6%, a difference of 3.7%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Blackfeet |
| Minimum | 40.4% | 27.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 59.6% | 72.7% |
| Mean | 69.9% | 65.5% |
| Median | 68.5% | 64.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.1% | 57.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.5% | 72.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 14.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 14.6% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Bulgarian (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (63.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (63.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Hungary (63.6%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |