Japanese vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Currently Married
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
44.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
44.3%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,168,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 44.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,355,169 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 44.3%, a difference of 0.38%.

Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
Minimum | 22.4% | 28.3% |
Maximum | 79.3% | 67.5% |
Range | 56.9% | 39.2% |
Mean | 42.3% | 45.3% |
Median | 43.7% | 44.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 38.2% | 40.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.4% | 48.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Ethiopia (44.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cambodia (44.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Ethiopian (44.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Mexico (44.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and Mexican American Indian (44.5%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Armenia (44.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Ugandan (44.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Nicaraguan (44.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Cameroon (44.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (44.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 44.6% |
Cubans | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 44.6% |
Seminole | 0.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 44.6% |
Moroccans | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 44.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 44.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 44.5% |
Ethiopians | 0.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 44.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 44.5% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 44.5% |
Japanese | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 44.5% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.4 /100 | #245 | Tragic 44.3% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 44.3% |
Ugandans | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 44.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 44.2% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 44.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 44.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 44.2% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.1% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 44.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 44.0% |
Yakama | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 44.0% |