Iroquois vs Panamanian Currently Married
COMPARE
Iroquois
Panamanian
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Iroquois
Panamanians
44.7%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.3%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Panamanian Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,297,556 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254 and weighted average of 44.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,208,339 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210 and weighted average of 45.3%, a difference of 1.2%.
![Iroquois vs Panamanian Currently Married](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/currently-married/iroquois-vs-panamanians-currently-married-chart.webp)
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Panamanian |
Minimum | 14.1% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 78.4% |
Range | 52.6% | 72.9% |
Mean | 44.5% | 46.8% |
Median | 46.1% | 46.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.7% | 44.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.2% | 54.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Panamanians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (44.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Nepalese (44.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Alaskan Athabascan (44.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Cuban (44.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Panama (44.9%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Portugal (45.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Thailand (45.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Kenyan (45.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Mexican (45.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Morocco (45.4%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Morocco | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 45.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 5.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 45.4% |
Panamanians | 4.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 45.3% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 3.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 45.2% |
Kenyans | 3.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 45.2% |
Mexicans | 3.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 45.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 2.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 45.1% |
Immigrants | Laos | 2.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 45.0% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 2.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 45.0% |
French American Indians | 2.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 45.0% |
Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 45.0% |
Spanish Americans | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 45.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 45.0% |
Cree | 1.7 /100 | #229 | Tragic 44.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 44.9% |
Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 44.9% |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 44.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 44.7% |
Iroquois | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 44.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 44.6% |
Cubans | 0.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 44.6% |