Inupiat vs Sierra Leonean Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Inupiat
Sierra Leonean
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Inupiat
Sierra Leoneans
42.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Sierra Leonean Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,320,700 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395 and weighted average of 42.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,352,562 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.310 and weighted average of 42.9%, a difference of 1.1%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Inupiat | Sierra Leonean |
Minimum | 12.1% | 10.1% |
Maximum | 81.8% | 73.4% |
Range | 69.7% | 63.3% |
Mean | 42.6% | 45.2% |
Median | 43.0% | 44.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.1% | 37.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.0% | 53.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Sierra Leoneans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Bermudan (42.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Ghanaian (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Africa (42.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ecuador (42.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (42.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (43.1%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |
Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.1% |