Inupiat vs Immigrants from Bahamas Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Inupiat
Immigrants from Bahamas
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Inupiat
Immigrants from Bahamas
42.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
41.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Immigrants from Bahamas Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,320,700 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395 and weighted average of 42.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,610,461 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 41.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Immigrants from Bahamas |
| Minimum | 12.1% | 21.9% |
| Maximum | 81.8% | 65.9% |
| Range | 69.7% | 44.1% |
| Mean | 42.6% | 41.0% |
| Median | 43.0% | 39.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.1% | 35.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.0% | 45.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat and Immigrants from Bahamas by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Bermudan (42.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Ghanaian (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from Honduras (41.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Ghana (41.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (41.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Arapaho (41.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |