Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Luxembourger Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Luxembourger
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Luxembourgers
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Luxembourger Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,791,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 63.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,654,456 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495 and weighted average of 63.3%, a difference of 0.28%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 31.0% | 41.4% |
Maximum | 89.0% | 93.3% |
Range | 57.9% | 51.9% |
Mean | 66.3% | 67.9% |
Median | 65.4% | 67.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.0% | 63.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.0% | 72.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Luxembourgers by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Potawatomi (63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (63.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Bahamian (63.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |
Icelanders | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic 63.3% |