Immigrants from Philippines vs Danish Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,847,260 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056 and weighted average of 29.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,642,797 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 28.7%, a difference of 0.87%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Philippines	Danish
Minimum	10.2%	3.0%
Maximum	46.7%	100.0%
Range	36.5%	97.0%
Mean	28.7%	32.3%
Median	28.6%	30.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.3%	23.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.0%	36.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.7%	12.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.4%	16.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.4%	16.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Danes by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Peruvian (29.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Apache (29.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (29.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (29.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (29.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Hawaiian (28.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Guatemala (28.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Asia (28.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Sierra Leonean (28.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (28.9%, a difference of 0.45%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 29.1%
Spanish American Indians	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 29.1%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 29.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 29.0%
Fijians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 29.0%
Immigrants \| Philippines	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 29.0%
Peruvians	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 29.0%
Apache	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 29.0%
Jordanians	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 29.0%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 28.9%
Immigrants \| Peru	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 28.9%
Guatemalans	100.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 28.9%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	100.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 28.9%
Sierra Leoneans	100.0 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 28.9%
Immigrants \| Asia	100.0 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 28.8%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	100.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 28.8%
Danes	100.0 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 28.7%
Hawaiians	100.0 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 28.7%
Immigrants \| Nigeria	100.0 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 28.6%
Hmong	99.9 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 28.6%
Immigrants \| Ghana	99.9 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 28.6%