Immigrants from Philippines vs Danish Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,906,754 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,554,581 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 5.2%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Philippines	Danish
Minimum	3.6%	4.1%
Maximum	52.9%	51.2%
Range	49.4%	47.0%
Mean	14.9%	19.3%
Median	12.9%	14.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.5%	10.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	15.7%	24.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	13.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.1%	12.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.0%	12.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Danes by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Laotian (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Greece (14.2%, a difference of 0.73%), Italian (14.2%, a difference of 0.86%), Czech (14.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (13.8%, a difference of 1.1%), Luxembourger (13.8%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Danes	99.8 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.6%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.8 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.6%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.8%
Luxembourgers	99.7 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.8%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.6 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 13.9%
Lithuanians	99.6 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 14.0%
Koreans	99.6 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 14.0%
Croatians	99.5 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 14.0%
Estonians	99.4 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.4 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 14.1%
Greeks	99.4 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.4 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 14.1%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.4 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 14.1%
Czechs	99.3 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 14.1%
Italians	99.2 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 14.2%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.2 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 14.2%
Laotians	99.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 14.3%
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 14.3%