Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Costa Rican
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Costa Ricans
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
43.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,590,013 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.063 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 0.030%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 16.2% | 18.8% |
| Maximum | 91.9% | 70.1% |
| Range | 75.7% | 51.3% |
| Mean | 44.8% | 50.2% |
| Median | 46.2% | 49.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.3% | 46.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.5% | 55.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Costa Ricans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Brazilian (46.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Armenians | 58.2 /100 | #169 | Average 46.8% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 46.7% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.4% |
| Colombians | 31.8 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.3% |
| Fijians | 30.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.3% |